How To Connect The Hps To The Ballast

CIAK 2 - and now we see

is certainly not of continuity that the Democratic Party is heading towards the spring.
At this point one might dare to breathe a sigh of relief. Perhaps, but it's better to be watching a little while.
First, what has changed (because something has changed): for a start, the focus has changed (yes, of course, first of all, the name and the cutting of glasses, but did not want to end nell'ovvietà , this is all so repetitive these days ...). If in fact the vision
veltroniana of Pd was characterized by a strong tendency all'autoreferenzialità, the elusive question identity, offset by a severe disdain for the drives antiberlusconiane - no doubt with the aim to restore a little normalcy in the Italian political landscape - that of Franceschini is much less balanced, less clear, perhaps a bit more spontaneous (in the sense less spontaneous speech).
The real problem (now I have repeated ad nauseum) is that the attitude was too mature for an Italy veltroni mediated and teledomocratica. And not only. A soft approach was not only permeable to external attacks, but also bile acids that corrupted from within.
Now, Franceschini at the end of February may not have shown the warrior without blemish and without fear, capable of piercing the center utopia that has long expected. And, as I said, it was definitely less balanced and less clear. But certainly not less busy: it is made clear on matters of major importance (end of life, ,...); European Parliament has recognized and made clear the external threat, Berlusconi and the emergency that is democratic, and not Failure to deal with internal threats to his face, contrasting with the current fragment us a unified and compact the party. An attitude of
drive ventral (pass me the term) more that's cool strategy.
And now let's see.

Meanwhile, one of the first (and repeated moves) is the dry position, one for all the tax on higher incomes (sic). Predictable response: the majority Franceschini accusation of "communism" - an accusation that denotes great intellectual agility and political maturity, but that's another story. Rifondazione accuses him of having given to the 'charity state "- that's the other peaks of the Italian political scene. And to think that it was the radical left to fly the slogan "the rich also cry." It was not very long ago, remember? The government there was a certain Prodi. The last time she was spotted at Palazzo Chigi among others.
We are therefore faced with a double paradox: not only the Radicals (and not only them) Franceschini accused of something they themselves have tried to do a couple of years ago, but accuse him of wanting to do something that has nothing to do with the above. This is not to punish anyone not want to give charity to anyone. No class struggle. E 'redistribution, baby.
I mean if it really is time that were wearing their "habit tax" (Massimo Giannini, LaRepubblica March 12, 2009), it is the responsibility governments try to alleviate the conditions are worse. And not only I say. They say many in Europe and America. You want names? One for all: Obama. Him a few days ago, from the pulpit of democracy, the country has announced an increase in "taxes for the rich" in order to ensure that all public health care "(thorny issue in U.S. election campaign, at least as abortion or artificial insemination by us). So why in the U.S. nobody bat an eyelid and we seem to have said Franceschini bestiality? And why so many voices are raised against a proposal, if not acceptable, at least reasonable and instead they are silent about other facts, such as the denominations of € 300 million fund for social policies and social welfare and tax evasion incentives granted by the government (see the abolition of the traceability of payments)?
Certainly not a very detailed and thoughtful proposal. We even said that the attitude of Franceschini is unclear. But if a proposal, even if presented in a somewhat 'naive and incoherent, however, is interesting and valuable, why do not they discuss? because it is rejected in the trunk, so overwhelmed by accusations of place as ridiculous?
Of all the defects of the PD, the sloth was perhaps the worst. Yes, it was. Why now, staggering, it's down in the field. In front there are many issues to be resolved, this is true, agree that it is proposed that solidarity with the lowest incomes, but not enough, there are union issues, social security, .... a lot of (- ) wings at risk, flying wildly in opposite directions, tearing the unity of the party. But while we are inside. Again. And the proposals on the agenda are simple, comprehensive, concrete. Reali.
not for nothing that even the League has backed Franceschini in this sense. E 'heartening. Shows that there is more space. But in his swallow everything Berlusconi has left gaps and policy-makers who can transform the Democratic Party in his room for maneuver.
the game starts, then.